In this article, we will be explaining the jewish origins of the United States. How it was always rotten since day one, how the Founding Fathers were White traitors who gladly worked with jews to subvert Whites, and how the United States is the greatest enemy to our cause—all with heavily sourced evidence backing up what we say.
The Founding Shabbos Goys and Americanism Origins:
Americanism, as in the official ideology of the United States since the American Revolution and its general cultural effects, is incompatible with our worldview. Too many in the US movement say the same thing Conservatives do: that the United States has strayed from the principles of the Founding Fathers and the US Constitution, and we need to restore them.
This is flawed thinking and assuming that the Founding Fathers were “our guys” when nothing could be further from the truth. The United States we exist in is a logical conclusion of what the Founding Fathers intended. As long as you don’t have an elementary schooler’s knowledge of the American Revolution, which romanticizes rather than gives anything too in-depth. This is what they wanted as an end goal.
Of course the rebuttal to this is “Well, they said some racist stuff though!”. True, but this is a very American way of understanding history. That is, not considering the context of the time and judging things by your mindset in the 21st century rather than considering the time period. This is in 18th-century Colonial America. Blacks weren’t even considered human by 99.9% of Whites and were counted in the census the same as livestock.
I don’t view history this way; I view history in the context of the time period it was in. Which is the correct way of viewing history and how the rest of the world but Americans view history. This is also why American historians are never taken seriously outside of the US and considered political hacks rather than academics.
The Founding Fathers, within the context of their time period, were Liberals of their time for nearly all of them. I’ve read their works and studied them. Let me go to each prominent Founding Father in their own sections to explain this further.
James Madison:
James Madison was the author of the Bill of Rights and the US Constitution. In a letter to his jewish friend Jacob De La Motta remarking how much he loves jews and is so happy they’re American citizens. How other nations may hate jews but the United States will protect them and give them a home. You can read that here, and it is quoted below here:
“I have received your letter of the 7th. inst: with the Discourse delivered at the consecration of the Hebrew Synagogue at Savannah, for which you will please to accept my thanks.
The history of the Jews must for ever be interesting. The modern part of it is at the same time so little generally known, that every ray of light on the subject has its value.
Among the features peculiar to the political system of the U. States, is the perfect equality of rights which it secures to every religious sect. And it is particularly pleasing to observe in the good citizenship of such as have been most distrusted and oppressed elsewhere, a happy illustration of the safety & success of this experiment of a just & benignant policy. Equal laws protecting equal rights are found as they ought to be presumed, the best guarantee of loyalty & love of country; as well as best calculated to cherish that mutual respect & good will among Citizens of every religious denomination, which are necessary to social harmony and most favorable to the advancement of truth. The account you give of the Jews of your Congre[g]ation brings them fully within the scope of these observations. I tender you, Sir, my respects & good wishes”
The Bill of Rights itself is also a Liberal document. Yes, having guns is cool. But the other amendments do not correlate with our worldview. We do not believe in freedom of speech. We do not believe in restrictions on the military’s power (as long as we control them). We do not believe in restrictions on the Security Services (as long as we control them). I could go on. They all are against our worldview minus the second, and even then, the second amendment would only go to loyal, honorable Whites. So that’s only a partial agreement. It’s not like we’re okay with allowing communist insurgents to own guns if we were in power.
This is the guy who authored the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, the very documents that our system bases itself off of to this day. So the fact that the United States itself bases itself off of a document written by a complete shabbos goy does matter here.
Speaking of the US Constitution itself. While no one in the US who isn’t a Supreme Court Justice has ever read it, including nearly all politicians. This document created by James Madison isn’t of our worldview; it’s opposed to it. It’s a Liberal document advocating for a Liberal Democratic Republic. We do not believe in checks and balances. We do not believe in democratic parliaments. We do not believe in restrictions on leadership to restrict their powers and effectiveness. Hitler argued against this in Mein Kampf and the dangers this exact system causes.
To expand further on this. Article 5 of the US Constitution, which allows for amendments, is based on the Liberal belief of “Whig History”. That being that history naturally becomes more progressive in social values over time and the whole “right side of history” nonsense. This was a deeply held belief among most of the Founding Fathers that future people will become more socially progressive as time goes on and should be given abilities to ensure that. Those of our worldview oppose this.
Article 5 completely debunks the myth held by Conservatives and many in the US movement that the United States simply “lost its way” and we need to just go back. No, this was in fact the intention of the Founding Fathers to end up like this. They literally put a section of the US Constitution to allow this.
So not only is the author himself not of our worldview, but the document he created that the United States government bases itself on to this day opposes our worldview heavily. The counterargument to this is, “Well, we’ll just change it to our worldview”. I have a better option. Why not burn it and make a new document without praising or giving respect to any of these freaks and acknowledge these men were opposed to our worldview? That seems like a better plan to me.
George Washington:
George Washington was also very much against anti-jewish sentiments. In various letters after the American Revolution, he wrote endlessly of his disdain of anti-jewish beliefs. In a letter in 1790 to a synagogue in Newport, Rhode Island. He wrote how jews will always be valued citizens of the United States and how his administration will crack down on antisemitic bigotry and will go after antisemites. Source here, and I’ll quote below:
“While I receive, with much satisfaction, your Address replete with expressions of affection and esteem; I rejoice in the opportunity of assuring you, that I shall always retain a grateful remembrance of the cordial welcome I experienced in my visit to Newport, from all classes of Citizens.
The reflection on the days of difficulty and danger which are past is rendered the more sweet, from a consciousness that they are succeeded by days of uncommon prosperity and security. If we have wisdom to make the best use of the advantages with which we are now favored, we cannot fail, under the just administration of a good Government, to become a great and a happy people.
The Citizens of the United States of America have a right to applaud themselves for having given to mankind examples of an enlarged and liberal policy: a policy worthy of imitation. All possess alike liberty of conscience and immunities of citizenship It is now no more that toleration is spoken of, as if it was by the indulgence of one class of people, that another enjoyed the exercise of their inherent natural rights. For happily the Government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens, in giving it on all occasions their effectual support.
It would be inconsistent with the frankness of my character not to avow that I am pleased with your favorable opinion of my Administration, and fervent wishes for my felicity. May the Children of the Stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the good will of the other Inhabitants; while every one shall sit in safety under his own vine and figtree, and there shall be none to make him afraid. May the father of all mercies scatter light and not darkness in our paths, and make us all in our several vocations useful here, and in his own due time and way everlastingly happy.”
So if we’re so against presidents today for literally stating the same thing word for word. Why are we cool with George Washington also doing this?
Reminder that Hitler banned the German-American Bund from having any links to the Third Reich. With one of the main reasons being their claim that George Washington was “The First National Socialist” at Madison Square Garden. Which disgusted him and others in the NSDAP. Hitler himself had the same exact hatred of Americanism that all of the staff, including myself do with Hitler stating:
“I don’t see much future for the Americans … it’s a decayed country. And they have their racial problem, and the problem of social inequalities … my feelings against Americanism are feelings of hatred and deep repugnance … everything about the behaviour of American society reveals that it’s half Judaised, and the other half negrified. How can one expect a State like that to hold together?”
George Washington also visited synagogues and wrote more letters reminding jews that the new United States will be their friend on a grand tour of him courting jewish Americans. How those evil Europeans might be anti-jewish but America will forever be their friend, and he’ll crack down on anti-jewish bigotry among Americans. He held that promise, so he really was a man of his word as his reputation goes. You can read about that here. The link is from Mount Vernon, talking about and giving multiple sources for all of this.
Again, why do we hate it when modern politicians say this but also ignore it when the literal Founders of the United States also state the exact same things? This isn’t some recent thing. This has been part and parcel with the United States since day one.
Just like James Madison and just like it’ll be with the others. I do not care if they considered blacks to be subhuman. Everyone did; again, blacks were considered livestock and were counted in the census as such. Someone hating blacks and even owning them does not mean they are with us or our worldview. Yet another symptom of the US movement’s low standards and ignorance and declaring someone good just because they do boilerplate bare minimum racism.
Thomas Jefferson:
Thomas Jefferson, the author of the US Declaration of Independence, was a humanist atheist (for the time period) Liberal. No different from the ones you find today.
He did many things, including making his own Bible, the Jefferson Bible, in which he removed all the miracles of Jesus and instead pasted together words from Jesus and some biblical figures he felt best represented his views on equality and a Liberal worldview. Which even if you have a negative opinion of Christianity. Ask yourself, what type of person do you know today that loves citing Jesus Christ or the Bible in general to justify the Liberal worldview while not actually giving a shit about believing in Christianity? Oh yeah, it’s the Liberal guy who is citing this to justify migrants and other nonsense.
Beyond just his Bible, Thomas Jefferson also really disliked how intolerant the average White American was to other races, and he imagined in the future how Muslims and jews can be future citizens of America too. Writing “neither Pagan nor Mahamedan [Muslim] nor Jew ought to be excluded from the civil rights of the Commonwealth because of his religion.”.
To expand on this further. He had statutes protecting minorities in Virginia that he wrote as well. That being the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, a precursor to the Freedom of Religion aspect of the First Amendment. Thomas Jefferson wrote about his intentions privately for this statute, saying “the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo, and Infidel of every denomination”. In translation to a modern context, this was meant to protect not just White Christians/Non-Believers but also jews, Muslims, and Hindus as “citizens”. Outside of Muslims in the Balkans, there are no Whites who were jewish, Muslim, or Hindu at this time. Hindu itself was a term used for Indians in India specifically, just as it is to this day in India.
Why would they need protection by law if he didn’t intend them as citizens too?
Thomas Jefferson was also disgusted by people being anti-jewish. Remarking in a letter to his jewish friend M.M. Noah how only the “feeble” believe in it and how the powerful use this to be mean to jews for no reason. Where have you heard that talking point before?
Quote from his letter here:
“[Y]our sect by it’s sufferings has furnished a remarkable proof of the universal spirit of religious intolerance, inherent in every sect, disclaimed by all while feeble, and practised by all when in power. our laws have applied the only antidote to this vice, protecting our religious, as they do our civil rights by putting all on an equal footing. but more remains to be done. … nothing I think would be so likely to effect this as to your sect particularly as the more careful attention to education, which you recommend, and which placing it’s members on the equal and commanding benches of science, will exhibit them as equal objects of respect and favor.”
And here is Thomas Jefferson’s jewish friend Jacob De La Motta reporting to a synagogue in Savannah, Georgia, promising jews protection against antisemites and explaining how they can get spots in academia and government. How unlike the previous British colonial administration, the new United States will give jews full rights in the colonies as well:
“excites in him [Jefferson] the gratifying reflection that his own country has been the first to prove to the world two truths, the most salutary to human society, that man can govern himself, and that religious freedom is the most effectual anodyne against religious dissension: the maxim of civil government being reversed in that of religion, where it’s true form is ‘divided we stand, united we fall.’ he is happy in the restoration, of the Jews particularly, to their social rights, & hopes they will be seen taking their seats on the benches of science, as preparatory to their doing the same at the board of government.”
The source for that, as well as his other letters to his jewish friends can be found on Monticello’s website here. There are a couple other letters here, but he’s just doing typical Liberal atheist “God is a meanie in the Bible” type whining. Rather than it being in opposition to Judaism itself and the jews. He very clearly felt disgusted by antisemitism, as established above, and thought of you as a retard if you believed in it.
Remind me again how the Founding Fathers were these based National Socialists who wanted a White homeland? Really try to convince me here. I don’t see how a National Socialist could be in favor of not only granting jews citizenship but also favoring them above Whites as betters for academia and government positions.
Just because he remarked that blacks were subhuman doesn’t make him our guy. Again, blacks weren’t considered human at the time. So someone in the late 18th century holding that view was the view of 99.9% of White people at the time. Anti-jewish sentiment was commonplace in Europe in the 19th century as well, so much so that Marx and Bakunin both wrote anti-jewish essays themselves. Yet I doubt anyone reading this within the US movement is going to be calling Marxism or Anarcho-Communism great anytime soon. Jeffrey Epstein hated blacks too and went on tangents to his sex slaves about why blacks are inferior. Who the fuck cares?
John Adams:
John Adams was a major Founding Father as well as the second US President. There isn’t much to write about that I haven’t written about the others on this list (in fact, I’m not covering every single Founding Father for this reason. Otherwise things start to get repetitive). What makes him noteworthy is him being even more blatant about his love of jews. Going so far as to state this:
“The Hebrews have done more to civilize men than any other nation. If I were an atheist, and believed blind eternal fate, I should still believe that fate had ordained the Jews to be the most essential instrument for civilizing the nations.”
John Adams blatantly stated how not only he is happy with jewish influence in White nations (civilized nations means White ones in the 18th century). He considers their influence mandatory in White nations and considers them better than Whites.
On top of all of this, John Adams coined the phrase “Nation of Laws, Not Men”. That being said, we’re not a nation of a people. We’re a nation of laws. Everything is based around laws. Everything is just a legal entity written on paper. This is a keystone doctrine of the Liberal worldview, in fact the main thing holding it all together. That laws, not things like race, are the most important thing out there. That there is a divine nature to laws and legal constructs.
Legalism like this is a jewish concept. It comes from the Talmud. It’s something that the Third Reich held in contempt through men like Carl Schmitt. Laws are not divine. Rights are not given. These are all arbitrary and man-made. Laws are just words on paper. Might makes right, and laws are whatever those in power decide them to be. The only true laws are the laws of nature. Everything else is arbitrary and artificial.
Remind me again how these individuals should be held in high regard by someone who considers themselves of our worldview? I really need to know this because so far what I’ve seen are White traitor Liberals gushing over jews, specifically constructing the United States Government with them in mind using jewish ideas, and holding Whites in contempt for “bigotry” against jews and hating Europe.
There is a reason Hitler held Americanism and the Founders in disgust and hatred. Now you know why in detail yourself.
Haym Salomon:
While not well known to most Americans, unlike the more famous Founding Fathers. Haym Salomon was indeed a Founding Father. Haym Salomon was a Polish-jewish banker who financed the entire American Revolution. Without his money and connections, the revolution would not have succeeded.
I bring him up because the US movement narrative of the American Revolution, which is an ahistorical one, portrays it as our guys against a jewish-funded British Empire. While I’m not a real fan of the British Empire, and yes, they had jewish financiers of their own, such as the Rothschild banking family, most famously. The American Revolution was funded by a jewish banker all the same.
Those that supply the money often call the shots. This makes sense why so many of the Founding Fathers who wrote the political documents founding the US Government and made the political decisions as President or in Congress decided to love jews so much and how it influenced them in their decisions, writings, and more. The crackdown on anti-jewish “bigotry” on Whites and hatred for Europe as well came from this influence.
He who controls the money in a nation controls the power in that nation. Jewish bankers like Haym Salomon controlled that money. They made the United States government as a safe haven for jews. A counter to European states that opposed them and to bully them in the future to their will. To make their golem.
That investment paid off 163 years later in the war against the Third Reich. It would not have been possible for the Allies to win even before the US went to direct war against Germany without the US’s vast wealth of resources supplying the other Allied Powers. The Eastern Front and the Battle for Britain could have been won if it wasn’t for the “Arsenal of Democracy”. It’s a golem that has paid off for the jews time and time again. Their muscle for whenever they want to put someone they don’t like in line. The best investment they ever made.
Freemasonry:
While the Freemasons today are but a husk of themselves. Now it’s just no more than a country club for old men who like playing pretend as they slowly rot away into the dustbin of history. The Freemasons of the 18th to early 20th centuries were a dangerous and subversive organization.
Everyone likes focusing on their religious practices, which are a subset of Gnosticism. To be honest, in my own opinion, I don’t really care about the weird LARP rituals they did. What is ignored is that the Freemasons weren’t just some esoteric occult club for weirdos. Those were everywhere at the time. What separates them is that they were a political organization first, everything else second.
The entire point of their organization and even their rituals is the obsession with “the enlightenment of mankind”. That being the opposition to the traditional structures that Whites had relied on for centuries during their time period. With the promotion of Liberalism and Egalitarianism in their place.
Freemasonry itself can best be defined as the “White traitors club”, speaking very broadly here. It of course depends on the sect and lodge, especially in the later United States’s history. The US Freemasonry branch in the US turned into a glorified social club after the Civil War, while the European branch remained subversive well into the 20th century.
Every single time there is jewish interests being put in place. You can bet your life there was a Freemason White who was the frontman for that between the 18th century and the 20th century.
There is a reason why many European institutions banned them. There is a reason why the SS raided their temples and the Third Reich banned them. They’re White traitors who promote a worldview that is antithetical to our own. It’s an institution that’s inherently subversive.
If you want to read on the topic further. Here is a booklet translated from German to English by the SS discussing the issues with Freemasonry and why it was banned in the Third Reich. Including internal documents from the Freemasons in Europe that the SS recovered from their temples they raided.
The point of all of this is because most of the key founding fathers themselves were Freemasons or had links to them. They were a part of an organization whose American branch at the time was openly subversive and hostile to White racial interests. Openly collaborative with jews. So this puts into context the things we’ve cited of these men being anti-White and openly pro-jewish.
The Post-Revolution Beast:
The WASP Elite Question:
To expand further on the myth of the “Fallen United States”, which is so pervasive that you can even read it in radical National Socialist literature like SIEGE and other works. America never “fell” from greatness in the sense of Whites controlling everything. That was never the case. The US since day one the Founding Fathers themselves were happy to be shabbos goys. The US has always been a jewish controlled golem.
WASP elites in America have always been shabbos goys. They still are; they never lost their position. I never got why people thought they lost power when they’re still here. They run the intelligence communities, have authority in the State Department and the Pentagon, make up a large part of the DOJ administration, and make up a large part of Corporate America’s executive class.
They took their thirty pieces of silver 249 years ago and are still getting rewarded for that. They’re still the system’s middle managers.
So this is where I get into disagreements over the fallen nation myth. What fallen nation? When was the US ever great for Whites? Looking at the history of this nation since day one, it was an anti-White project. The US was funded and given direction on formation as a jewish controlled nation to be a juggernaut to counter possible threats to jews in Europe and put any Whites not in the US in line in case they get anti-jewish tendencies.
Things are generally still the same in how things are run, more or less.
I’ve seen multiple groups act like WASP elite leadership are innocent victims who got fucked over by the jews, including friends of mine thinking this. Have you ever met a WASP elite? I have. Most of them are scumbag race traitors who openly hate our race with a burning passion. They’re the White traitors everyone invokes but at the same time acting like they are clean victims.
The Puritans and Anglicans of New England that are these elites never went away. The Puritans of America are now the United Church of Christ, and the Anglicans are the Episcopalians. If you’ve ever seen either of these churches in the US. They’re those pro-migrant, pro-LGBT, anti-White churches you see. That’s your WASP elite. WASP elites are so anti-White that they freaked out and broke off ties with US immigration services because they asked them to help settle White South Africans in the US rather than brown migrants.
Great people, huh?
In my opinion, we should do away with this cohort of WASP elites who act as system middle managers to this day. They’ve been White traitors here for 249 years and counting. Any radical pro-White movement worth their salt would recognize the obvious. They should be removed from power the same as the jews. That total abolition of the system includes the WASP elites as well.
This should be recognized. The WASP elite are just as much our enemy as any jewish elite in power is. In fact, worse due to their status as White traitors. A real White America should reflect the Whites that are here, not the rotting class of British aristocrats in the US who sit and screw other Whites over.
The United States Destroying Europe by Ryan Arthur:
From the time of its first post-revolution interactions with European colonies in the Americas, the United States acted in a subversive manner—constantly attempting to undermine European control over their colonies, funding Liberal revolutionaries, and acting as an anti-White force. The United States consistently gave aid, both moral and financial, to insidious Latin American revolutionaries, whose sole goal was the overthrow of the White Order.
This anti-European colonial foreign policy approach was apparent as early as the founding of the United States itself, but the weakness of the US Government and the lack of anti-colonial revolutionary activity in nearby colonies limited this to little more than political grandstanding—when, however, the first opportunity arose to subvert Spanish rule in Latin America, the US Government jumped on it—in 1810, the National Intelligencer, the official newspaper of the Madison administration, called for the people of Latin America to declare themselves “free, sovereign, and independent” of Spain.
Immediately afterward, President Madison called upon a friend, William Shaler, to travel to the Spanish colonies of Cuba and New Spain (which was to become Mexico) in order to speak to revolutionary leaders and find ways for the United States to cooperate with them.
Semi-official ambassadors were also sent to Venezuela, Chile, and Argentina, and representatives of their revolutionary governments were allowed into the United States to purchase arms, ammunition, and various other supplies to be used to fight the Spanish.
In 1812, an official congressional resolution declared that “Congress beholds with friendly interest the establishment of independent sovereignties by the Spanish provinces in America”, and despite the United States’ official neutrality in the Latin American Wars of Independence, the US turned a blind eye to American merchants, privateers, financiers, and mercenaries acting in the interests of the Latin American revolutionaries.
After the anti-Spanish revolutions in the Americas had succeeded, the US Government, in 1823, announced the Monroe Doctrine—confirming that the United States was now willing to prop up the post-colonial Latin American states with force, denying Spain any chance to reclaim the lands that had been theirs for hundreds of years. Though outside the purview of this article, this doctrine was later used to undermine Napoleon III’s attempt to install a civilized, White government in Mexico, and the United States policy of damaging the foreign interests of various European powers continued long afterwards—see, for example, the Suez Crisis.
Lewis Levin and The Jewish Psyop On Our Movement:
The wedding of Americanism with our views can be traced back to one man. Lewis Levin, a jew and, in fact, the second jewish man to be elected to Congress. Lewis Levin was the founder of the Native American Party, better known as the Know Nothings.
There was a growing movement for White racialism in the United States in the 19th century. He quickly took it over. Instead of questioning things like jewish influence or Americanism. He redirected it. Instead, Americanism is White racialism (despite the man not being White himself). Any hatred for the movement should instead be directed at other Europeans moving to the US.
The whole Irish and Italians aren’t White thing that our opponents love citing as why racialism is fake and arbitrary was from a jew, Lewis Levin. A very jewish tactic to play both sides. Subvert one into absurdity, and then the other uses that absurdity to discredit the entire movement that both jews hate.
Americanism in the movement is itself a jewish subversion. The historical record shows this. Lewis Levin married it to our movement in the proto years of the 19th century because of the Southeast’s racial awakening. Many White racialists were beginning to oppose Americanism. We saw this finalized with some organizations in the 1870s, such as the 1st generation Ku Klux Klan and the White League of Louisiana. Which openly opposed Americanism and the US as an anti-White entity.
Since then the movement has struggled to rid itself of Americanism. All originating from a jew who wasn’t even White that just took things over and married Americanism with our cause. Which is why we must rid ourselves of this jewish psyop on our cause entirely.
What is the Future for White Americans?:
A question to be asked from all of this is “What now?”. The United States was a jewish creation from day one. So what future is there for us? Yes, we’re in uncharted territory living in a fake nation that was itself a jewish project.
I don’t see this with nihilism. I see this with excitement. We can chart our own creation in our own image. Destroying this rotten jewish created republic and all of its influence is a must. Instead, as Hitler envisioned for America. A re-establishment of ties with Europe.
While the Confederacy was far from perfect. Hitler viewed the Confederacy’s defeat in the American Civil War as a tragedy ensuring the United States we have today. Unlike the United States, the CSA tried to establish proper good-faith ties with many European countries. Seeking to model the Southeast as a part of that dynamic. Something that anti-White European Liberals and Leftists sabotaged as much as they could to ensure the CSA failed.
A similar model could be tried here, albeit in a more National Socialist-oriented way rather than a confederation of states like the CSA. That North America rejoins the European sphere rather than it being “The New World”. The New World vs. Old World dynamic is strictly anti-European and something to cement in a White American’s mind that they have zero links to Europe itself. There is no “New World”. There is only one world for Whites.
Re-establishing these ties is a must. Returning to a pre-1776 way of viewing ourselves as White Americans, as a part of Europe. Similar to how the Anglosphere operates or the Boer in South Africa still maintaining ties to the Netherlands. A proper reconnection with Europe is a must for any future White nation on the North American continent.
This isn’t to say throw every White person of American origin into the trash. Not saying to throw all of American history into the trash. It is clear, however, that the US Government project itself was a jewish one. We must throw out the White traitors of the past. Build a new identity out of what is good here and what we can create for the future. It’s the only proper way for a proper future.
Now that’s an idea for a future we can be in support of.
I’m Not American Though?:
For non-American readers. The United States Government is still your greatest enemy. They actively to this day subvert other countries. While China seeks old-school imperialism (having tributary states and access to resources for their people, which is still bad). The United States, much like the USSR, seeks subversion and destruction of peoples for ideological reasons.
We’ve seen this leaked out as recently as 2006 in Estonia. Where the US Embassy in Tallinn internally discusses ways of subverting Estonians to racemix and accept mass migration. In comically evil ways of infiltrating the schooling system, using NGO front groups, and infiltrating the Estonian Government. The National Alliance wrote a piece on the leaks here.
If they’re willing to do this to a nation as small as Estonia. They do this to other White countries too. Reminder that the majority of staff at a US Embassy aren’t typical employees. They’re working for the CIA and NSA. This is a big open secret and well known. Most countries have their intelligence agencies staffed at their embassies.
The difference with the United States is they act like the USSR did. Not just keeping tabs on another country from their embassy but actively using agents for ideological subversion. If you’re not American. Look up the events your US Embassy is taking part in and/or hosting. We bet our lives that it has something to do with the promotion of subversion to anti-White ends.
The US Embassy in Bratislava, for example, had former skinhead Christian Piccolini appear to teach Slovakian children to not be involved in nationalist organizations. To hate nationalism and love diversity. You can check that out here.
The point of this is. If you’re not American but in a White country. Your US Embassy is a subversion base. Look up events they host and programs they’re funding. These are not embassy workers whose job it is to get you a travel visa or to help American tourists. These are intelligence agents working to subvert your country and destroy your people. They are your enemy.
I’m not advocating illegal actions against them of course; that’s stupid and just suicide. What I am advocating, however, is if you are an organization of our worldview. These subversive anti-White freaks should be called out for what they are. Subversives in your homeland are trying to destroy it through subversion. Disrupt their events they host. Make it known that the US Embassy is funding and hosting things like mass migration and subversive degeneracy. Make their intelligence agents, because that’s what they should be called, know that they’re not welcome doing what they do in your country.
US subversion is not welcome. They don’t get to enjoy a vacation in your home while actively subverting it. Anti-Americanism shouldn’t just be the belief here in the US movement but the broader global movement as well. The US Government shouldn’t have an easy, unchallenged time subverting things. If they want to subvert things, they have to work for it.
Want to host an event for school children to hate themselves and their country? Not without it being called out and exposed by Nationalists they won’t. Not without Nationalists being there to bring as much attention to it and to give these intelligence agents a hard time for trying something like that.
The United State Government is the enemy of Whites globally. They should be recognized as such. No different than the USSR was back in the 20th century.
In Conclusion:
To conclude all of this. The American Revolution was a jewish funded and supported revolution. The end being to create a golem to which jews and their White traitor collaborators can have a juggernaut to put any countries that oppose jewish will in line. It’s the best investment they ever made.
Anti-Americanism is mandatory for our worldview. We must oppose the US Government and its subversion. We must oppose its ideology and consider it the same as Marxism with the USSR. The United States is a global enemy to White interests.
We seek its replacement with a White nation that returns back to the European sphere once more. No longer as an enemy subversive state but as a brother nation.
Hail Victory!